Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1303

reference
639-tree-1
name
1303
tree-preservation-order

undefined

639-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.045835 50.866773)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.045736 50.866762,-1.045740 50.866782,-1.045754 50.866800,-1.045776 50.866814,-1.045803 50.866823,-1.045834 50.866826,-1.045865 50.866823,-1.045893 50.866815,-1.045915 50.866801,-1.045929 50.866783,-1.045935 50.866764,-1.045930 50.866745,-1.045916 50.866727,-1.045895 50.866713,-1.045867 50.866704,-1.045836 50.866700,-1.045806 50.866703,-1.045778 50.866712,-1.045755 50.866726,-1.045741 50.866743,-1.045736 50.866762)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL